KEMP Technologies positioned as the Sole visiona... » KEMP Technologies today announced that it has been included in the Gartner 2015 Magic Quadrant for A... Cyber security leader invests in PassiveTotal Co... » SAN FRANCISCO, US / LONDON, UK: RiskIQ has announced that it has acquired PassiveTotal to expand its... Research pole created » Lyon: Seven industrial groups and two research laboratories have come together to create a research ... Summoning Mr President, VP and SGF to the People's... » Series: Buharism and the Fierce Urgency of Now ...Let's have it put in the public domain the break... Digital Guardian now delivers next generation da... » London, United Kingdom: Digital Guardian, the only endpoint security platform purpose-built to stop ... £78,000 GUN FINDS IN SCOTLAND – INCLUDING SAS ST... » Patrick Hawes, Director of Bonhams Sporting Guns Department in London will be on hand next week at t... POLICE ABUSE » Series: Buharism and the Fierce Urgency of Now So you wanna hire police for your next party? Go ... The Co-operative Group selects Eckoh to strengthen... » Eckoh has announced it has been selected by The Co-operative Group to provide its secure payment sol... Indyme gets ready for its first UK award » Customer engagement and loss prevention specialist nominated for two Retail Fraud awards Indyme, a ... ESET joins European Cyber Security Month to rais... » London, UK: ESET is once again helping to raise awareness about cyber threats during the annual Euro...


Viewpoints Header

It seems that this disk drive may have belonged to an analyst processing loan applications. It is likely that there was no need for the analyst to have access to full live data to meet the business need. So why was live data lost so easily – especially given the Canadian PIPEDA regulations that have been in place for more than 10 years?

Encryption is a non-negotiable requirement for sensitive data such as personal information. PIPEDA requires “appropriate security measures” to be in place when handling it. There clearly wasn’t any here. Sadly, in data breaches like this the knee-jerk reaction is to encrypt all disk drives. That only solves a fraction of the risk challenge of handling sensitive data like loan application records. The real risk is the data, not the disk or server. Data goes everywhere – so protection has to be with the data itself. That said, where else is this information at risk? Why was such a significant trove of sensitive data on a portable disk drive in the first place? Why was someone able to copy unprotected data from an application or database without the appropriate protection? The industry has now agreed that traditional defenses – protecting infrastructure or storage, doesn’t do enough to protect data across the end-to-end data lifecycle. Fortunately, a new best practice called data-centric security has emerged as the leading method to mitigate breach risks. Data-centric security makes it easy to protect data wherever it goes to avoid the costly ramifications of data breaches accidental or malicious, yet enabling the data’s use in a data-rich process: a win-win for the CISO, privacy compliance and the line of business consuming the data.

Through powerful breakthroughs in data protection technology, it’s now possible to maximise data use without increasing risk without exposing the “live” data to low trust environments that are common in today’s information supply chain. Data-centric security techniques such as Format Preserving Encryption (FPE) – NIST FFX mode AES, are establishing the new standards for information protection. FPE enables data to stay protected from capture without the pain and friction of traditional data-encryption methods by allowing the protected data to preserve the look and feel of the original data. If anyone steals the FPE protected data or it’s lost, it’s useless to the attacker, removing the need for costly breach remediation. So in this case, the data in the records of 500,000 load applications could have been protected as it was captured and consumed across the business process without exposure. With a data-centric approach nobody would be footing the bill for $650,000 of unnecessary spend as in this case.