Scientifically proven: Schlemmer Group is among th... » For the first time, University of St. Gallen and the Akademie Deutscher Weltmarktführer (Academy of ... Cubic to continue supporting simulation training... » SAN DIEGO: Cubic Global Defense (CGD) has announced the award of a five-year, $33.7 million contract... Thales delivers high assurance and trust across ... » PLANTATION, Fla.: Thales has announced nShield XC, its next generation hardware security module (HSM... Free Wi-fi set to be introduced in the city » LEICESTER City Council is joining forces with BT to provide free wi-fi across some of the most popul... Exterity showcases integrated digital signage an... » Edinburgh:  Exterity has announced that at ISE 2016 it will demonstrate ArtioSign, its solution enab... Top Five Enterprise Data Privacy Mistakes » London, UK: Global businesses are reevaluating their data privacy programs this year as new privacy ... The Internet Society partners with network operato... » Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: In an agreement signed with the African Network Operators Group (AfNOG), the ... GranitePhone: A completely secured Smartphone » Logic Instrument announces that the first batch of 3,000 GranitePhones has been delivered in January... Computer Science For All » The White House, Washington Growing up in Buffalo, New York, I was lucky to have teachers in my loc... Rigby private equity opens up new office in Austri... » London, Cirencester and Woking, UK: Rigby Private Equity (RPE) announces the opening of a new office...

CLICK HERE TO

Viewpoints Header

It seems that this disk drive may have belonged to an analyst processing loan applications. It is likely that there was no need for the analyst to have access to full live data to meet the business need. So why was live data lost so easily – especially given the Canadian PIPEDA regulations that have been in place for more than 10 years?

Encryption is a non-negotiable requirement for sensitive data such as personal information. PIPEDA requires “appropriate security measures” to be in place when handling it. There clearly wasn’t any here. Sadly, in data breaches like this the knee-jerk reaction is to encrypt all disk drives. That only solves a fraction of the risk challenge of handling sensitive data like loan application records. The real risk is the data, not the disk or server. Data goes everywhere – so protection has to be with the data itself. That said, where else is this information at risk? Why was such a significant trove of sensitive data on a portable disk drive in the first place? Why was someone able to copy unprotected data from an application or database without the appropriate protection? The industry has now agreed that traditional defenses – protecting infrastructure or storage, doesn’t do enough to protect data across the end-to-end data lifecycle. Fortunately, a new best practice called data-centric security has emerged as the leading method to mitigate breach risks. Data-centric security makes it easy to protect data wherever it goes to avoid the costly ramifications of data breaches accidental or malicious, yet enabling the data’s use in a data-rich process: a win-win for the CISO, privacy compliance and the line of business consuming the data.

Through powerful breakthroughs in data protection technology, it’s now possible to maximise data use without increasing risk without exposing the “live” data to low trust environments that are common in today’s information supply chain. Data-centric security techniques such as Format Preserving Encryption (FPE) – NIST FFX mode AES, are establishing the new standards for information protection. FPE enables data to stay protected from capture without the pain and friction of traditional data-encryption methods by allowing the protected data to preserve the look and feel of the original data. If anyone steals the FPE protected data or it’s lost, it’s useless to the attacker, removing the need for costly breach remediation. So in this case, the data in the records of 500,000 load applications could have been protected as it was captured and consumed across the business process without exposure. With a data-centric approach nobody would be footing the bill for $650,000 of unnecessary spend as in this case.